SAARC vs BIMSTEC: Why Regional Integration is Failing in South Asia

South Asia cannot remain an archipelago of isolated economies connected only by shared history and mutual suspicion. Changing acronyms does not change reality. Summit declarations will not achieve true economic integration. True integration requires the political courage to dismantle physical and bureaucratic walls. Only then will the region stop holding its immense potential captive.
 

Md. Saiful Islam Shanto Apr 23, 2026
Image
SAARC vs BIMSTEC

South Asia has a population of nearly two billion people. It contains some of the fastest-growing economies in the world. The World Bank projects the region’s growth will reach a resilient 6.1 percent in 2026. This growth happens despite a difficult global economic environment. However, South Asia is completely failing at economic integration. Intra-regional trade sits dismally around 5 percent of total trade. This is extremely low compared to other regional blocs. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) sees roughly 25 percent intra-regional trade. The European Union sees nearly 60 percent. World Bank data reveals South Asian intra-regional trade could jump from $23 billion to $67 billion if countries simply removed artificial trade barriers. Yet, structural and political barriers remain massive. Trading between Bangladesh or India and distant nations like Brazil or Germany is often cheaper and faster than trading across a shared land border.

Leaders originally established the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) to fix this exact problem. SAARC was founded in Dhaka in 1985. It aimed to build mutual trust and create a cohesive economic bloc. Today, SAARC is completely inactive. The intractable hostility between India and Pakistan destroyed the organization. The SAARC charter requires unanimous consensus for all decisions. This rule gives India and Pakistan an effective veto over each other. Both are nuclear-armed members. Bilateral relations worsened over territorial disputes and cross-border terrorism. Direct trade between India and Pakistan has almost stopped entirely. In the 2023-2024 fiscal year, India exported roughly $1.18 billion to Pakistan and imported a mere $2.88 million. Key mechanisms like the Indus Water Treaty faced suspensions. SAARC visas were revoked. Consequently, the regional body ground to a halt. The last SAARC summit was the 18th gathering in Kathmandu in November 2014. The institutional machinery of South Asian integration has been frozen for twelve years.

Myanmar Instability a Hurdle 

Regional powers grew frustrated by the SAARC impasse. India led a deliberate strategic pivot toward the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC). Founded in 1997, BIMSTEC bypasses Pakistan entirely. It connects the five South Asian nations of the Bay of Bengal—Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, and Sri Lanka—with two Southeast Asian nations, Myanmar and Thailand. This pivot initially looked like a smart geopolitical move. It aligned with India’s "Act East" policy. It offered landlocked nations like Nepal and Bhutan a gateway to Southeast Asia.

Recent developments injected new diplomatic energy into BIMSTEC. The 6th BIMSTEC Summit took place in Bangkok on April 4, 2025. Member states adopted the "BIMSTEC Bangkok Vision 2030". This document aims for a prosperous, resilient, and open regional architecture. Members also signed the Agreement on Maritime Transport Cooperation. This agreement tries to reduce shipping costs and improve supply chain efficiency. Additionally, members signed official Memoranda of Understanding with the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA). Bangladesh assumed the BIMSTEC Chairmanship at the conclusion of the 2025 summit. Dhaka will steer the regional agenda through 2026 and beyond.

Despite the diplomatic achievements, the pivot to BIMSTEC has not cured the underlying fragmentation. BIMSTEC simply changed the waiting room. The organization faces its own formidable roadblocks. The most immediate roadblock is the ongoing crisis in Myanmar. Myanmar has suffered from a devastating internal conflict since the military takeover in 2021. Myanmar serves as the indispensable land bridge connecting South Asia to Southeast Asia. Its instability has severely stalled crucial connectivity projects. Construction on the India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway remains severely delayed. Without a stable Myanmar, seamless overland connectivity remains an impossible goal.

BIMSTEC also suffers from an agonizingly slow pace of economic institutionalization. Member states signed the BIMSTEC Free Trade Area Framework Agreement (BFTAFA) in 2004. A comprehensive, operational free trade area remains elusive more than two decades later. In March 2025, a working group on customs matters finally met in Dhaka to slowly discuss standardizing basic rules of origin. Negotiations on trade in goods, services, and investment are bogged down by endless technicalities. A deeply entrenched culture of domestic protectionism continuously blocks real progress.

Structural Economic Challenges 

The core reason for regional failure is fundamentally economic and bureaucratic. South Asian nations maintain some of the highest tariff and non-tariff barriers in the world against each other. The World Bank reports the average tariff in South Asia is more than double the global average. Nations protect their inefficient domestic industries using extensive sensitive lists. These lists exclude large categories of goods from tariff reductions. This practice severely harms regional consumers. Furthermore, crossing a South Asian border is a logistical nightmare. Border infrastructure is chronically underdeveloped. Customs procedures are archaic and heavily reliant on manual paperwork. Mutual recognition of standards is practically non-existent. A truck carrying perishable goods from Dhaka to Kolkata, or Kathmandu to Haldia, can languish for days at land customs stations. These extreme delays erase the fundamental advantage of geographic proximity.

South Asia also faces a severe structural economic challenge. The member economies are competitive rather than complementary. Many states rely heavily on similar export baskets. They heavily export the exact same ready-made garments, textiles, and agricultural products. ASEAN nations successfully build integrated regional supply chains. One ASEAN country processes raw materials, and another finalizes the product. South Asian nations do not cooperate this way. Instead, they fiercely compete against each other for the same Western consumer markets.

The strategic cost of this ongoing failure is immense. The global economy is increasingly characterized by protectionism and supply chain shocks. It also faces the weaponization of international trade. Regional resilience is now an absolute necessity. South Asian nations are leaving hundreds of billions of dollars in potential trade on the table by failing to integrate. They are also creating a dangerous geopolitical vacuum. Extra-regional powers step in to define the infrastructure and trade landscape. These outside powers use aggressive bilateral lending and investment projects. This dynamic leads directly to uncoordinated and strategically vulnerable dependencies.

The rhetoric of regional cooperation must give way to harsh economic pragmatism as we move deeper into 2026. Bangladesh is uniquely positioned to drive a hard bargain as the current chair of BIMSTEC. The region should not chase grandiose free trade agreements that take decades to negotiate. The focus must shift to immediate, functional cooperation. Countries must implement standardized, digitized customs procedures at the border. They need to rapidly expand cross-border energy grids to share surplus power. They must immediately operationalize the maritime transport agreements signed last year in Bangkok. South Asia cannot remain an archipelago of isolated economies connected only by shared history and mutual suspicion. Changing acronyms does not change reality. Summit declarations will not achieve true economic integration. True integration requires the political courage to dismantle physical and bureaucratic walls. Only then will the region stop holding its immense potential captive.

(The author is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Governance Studies (CGS), Dhaka, Bangladesh. He holds an M.S.S. and B.S.S. in International Relations from Jahangirnagar University. His research focuses on Security Studies, Migration, and South Asian Politics.  Views expressed are personal. He can be reached at md.saiful.stu2018@juniv.edu/  LinkedIn )

Post a Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.