Amidst fire, floods and felonies, relocation is the only viable option for Rohingyas in Bangladesh

It is only meaningful and sincere cooperation between Bangladesh authorities and a wide array of non-governmental, inter-governmental and development organizations which has, so far, made supporting 1.1 million Rohingyas with such limited resources possible, writes Habibur Rahman for South Asia Monitor 

Habibur Rahman Sep 25, 2021
Rohingyas in Bangladesh

The mighty Bangladesh monsoon has once again triggered flash floods and landslides in the Cox's Bazar area under the Chattogram division of Southeast Bangladesh where more than one million Rohingyas are living in crowded camps since 2017. The late July floods claimed 11 Rohingya lives, including those of four children. Over 4,000 shelters were washed away in a matter of hours, affecting at least 20,000 Rohingyas, many of whom had lost the roofs over their heads months ago when a deadly fire ripped some camps apart.

There had been more than 300 cases of landslides in late July 2021 alone. The situation is likely to get worse in the coming days as the rainy season in Bangladesh reaches its peak in September.

As the ongoing Rohingya crisis rolls into its fifth year in August 2021, the living conditions in the sprawling and squalid camps in southeast Bangladesh are declining even further. Currently, around 1.1 million Rohingyas are being sheltered in 34 extremely crammed camps, the largest one being the Kutupalong Balukhali camp which hosts almost half (626,500 in number) of the forcibly displaced people of Myanmar (FDMNs as the Bangladesh authorities identify this community). Each of these dilapidated makeshift shelters in camps covers barely a 10 square meter area but houses as many as 12 residents.

The 2018 World Bank data may provide a genuine perspective on the congestion problem in the camps. With an average of 1,240 people living in per square kilometer land area, Bangladesh stands as the 9th most densely populated country on Earth. China's Special Administrative Area (SAR) Macao tops the list with an average of 19,199 people living in one sq km. land area. In the Rohingya camps of Cox's Bazar, the population density ranges between 40,000 to 70,000 people per square kilometer, which is two times that of Macao and nine times the national average of Bangladesh.

Crime, Covid, fund crisis

According to a March 2021 report of Doctors Without Borders, the camps, in the last 12 months, have seen a sharp decline in living conditions, induced by Covid-19, an increase in criminal activities, and funding shortfall.

A December 2020 study, conducted by Gender and Adolescence: Global Evidence (GAGE), found a spike in the prevalence of hunger with 17.7 percent Rohingyas saying they felt hungrier in the four weeks preceding the study than pre-pandemic time.

The percentage of Rohingya households with poor food consumption rose from 5 to 15 percent. While the living condition of Rohingyas keeps falling further and further, each year since 2018 reported increasingly heavy rainfall that led to severe inundation of camps and more devastating landslides, wreaking havoc on Rohingya lives.

More than 8,000 acres of reserved forestland were razed to make room for the Rohingya camps. Now, amidst increasing natural adversities, the bamboo and tarpaulin sheets used to make Rohingya shelters, are finding it harder and harder to cling to the steep and bare hills.

As the Rohingyas find themselves stuck in limbo, the overall security situation in the host area Cox's Bazar has seen further deterioration recently. A local newspaper in an October 2020 article reported the presence of at least 30 organized and violent criminal groups and subgroups active in Rohingya camps, seemingly engaged in an endless turf war. These groups are heavily involved in human trafficking and yaba (cheap methamphetamine) and arms smuggling.

Between August 2017 and 2020, there had been at least 61 killings, 35 incidents of rape, and 16 kidnappings. More than 731 FIRs were filed against the Rohingyas during this period which led to the imprisonment of more than 600 of them.

The stalled repatriation process, deteriorating living conditions in Rohingya camps and utter frustration among the Rohingya youth are some of the major reasons that instigated this recent crime spree, locals argue. Such frustration has also made the Rohingyas in Cox’s Bazar easy prey to local and trans-border human trafficking gangs as evident in the rising number of Rohingyas boarding on crowded and rickety boats on perilous journeys to third countries.  

Locals versus Rohingyas

The tension between the Rohingyas and the host community is at an all-time high. A July 2021 study published in the Journal of International Humanitarian Action suggests a near 70 percent fall in labor wages, a 50 percent hike in prices of daily necessities and uneven access to humanitarian aid and resource opportunities may soon lead to resentment among the host community towards the Rohingyas.

The rising resentment may see a repeat of the recent wave of xenophobic violence that swept over the Turkish city of Ankara, targeting Syrian refugees, a terrible reversal of the community’s previous refugee-welcoming stance.

Since the funds to provide necessities for the Rohingyas are in sharp decline (86 percent shortfall in the first quarter of 2021), it goes without saying that the existing mechanism is in no way equipped to redress many grievances of the host community. All these make the current condition a ticking time bomb that can only be diffused via the relocation of a sizable portion of Rohingyas elsewhere.

Relocation to Bhasan Char

The response of some human rights and development organizations to the Bangladesh government’s attempt to relocate 100,000 Rohingyas to the island of Bhasan Char - in the Bay of Bengal and about 60 km from the Bangladesh mainland - is peculiar and myopic. A majority of allegations made against Bhasan Char relocation are centered on the island being flood-prone. Such critics often tend to forget that Bangladesh as a whole is flood-prone and highly vulnerable to natural calamities.

However, compared to the camps in Cox's Bazar, the settlements in Bhasan Char, in fact, showed much stronger resilience against raging monsoon. Being a flatland area, the island naturally reduces the risk of landslides which claimed 23 lives alone in July 2021 in Cox’s Bazar area.

Each of the 120 cluster villages in Bhasan Char has one cyclone shelter, capable of housing 1000 people and 200 cattle. The whole island has been secured with a four-layer embankment that goes 19 feet high. While the camps of Cox’s Bazar house cram up to 12 Rohingyas in a 10 sq. meter makeshift shelter, each Rohingya relocated to Bhasan Char will have an average area of 3.6 meters to himself as his living area, thus aptly solving the overcrowding problem.

The reliance on the solar-powered lighting system and bio-gas supply line also address the question of sustainability and exploitation of resources.

The point is not to present Bhasan Char as a bed of roses, but to show its enormous potential. It is only meaningful and sincere cooperation between Bangladesh authorities and a wide array of non-governmental, inter-governmental and development organizations which has, so far, made supporting 1.1 million Rohingyas with such limited resources possible.

Such cooperation can do wonders in Bhasan Char given the infrastructure provided. Although late, the global community has begun to recognize the real worth of Bangladesh’s effort. A visiting UNHCR delegation in June 2021 expressed their support for the relocation of Rohingyas in a "phased manner:. Similar appreciation also came from UN General Assembly President Volkan Bozkır who dubbed the initiative as an "example of Bangladesh’s humanity". Political parties - government and non-government - must recognize that the suffering of the Rohingyas and the host community have reached a tipping point. Arguments, based on abstract ideas and devoid of concrete action, can only cause disgrace to human dignity.

(The writer is an Australia-based Bangladeshi executive, philanthropist, and geopolitical analyst. The views expressed are personal. He can be reached at

Post a Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Newsletter Subscription

The subscriber's email address.
Stay informed - subscribe to our newsletter.
Tweets about SAMonitor
SAM Facebook